Capital Buffer Dynamics and Risk-Taking Behaviour of Nigerian Commercial Banks in the Post-Reform Era

Authors

  • Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala Covenant University
  • Charles Chukwuma Soludo Covenant University
  • Folarin Ikpesu Covenant University
  • Tolulope Osinubi Covenant University
  • Kazeem O. Ajide Covenant University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59976/jebin.v2i2.250

Abstract

This study examines the long-run determinants of capital buffer accumulation and risk-taking behaviour among listed Nigerian commercial banks during the period H1:2012 to H2:2023 an era marked by successive Basel III-aligned regulatory reforms, oil price shocks, pronounced naira depreciation, and persistent macroeconomic volatility. The purpose of this study is to investigate how bank-specific variables, macroeconomic cycle indicators, oil revenue cycles, and regulatory pressure jointly shape the long-run capital and risk-taking decisions of Nigerian banks a question that existing short-run simultaneous equation frameworks have been unable to adequately address. The methodology employs a Panel Autoregressive Distributed Lag (Panel ARDL) model estimated using the Pooled Mean Group (PMG) technique on hand-collected semi-annual data from eleven listed Nigerian commercial banks, incorporating a novel oil revenue cycle variable (OIL) to capture the compound procyclicality unique to Nigeria's resource-dependent macroeconomic structure. The findings reveal that Nigerian banks exhibit moral hazard behaviour, whereby rising non-performing loans erode capital buffers in the long run through the risk-weight channel rather than triggering proactive capital rebuilding. Capital buffer adjustment operates primarily through lending contraction and leverage compression rather than equity issuance a structural constraint imposed by the shallowness of Nigeria's domestic equity market. While higher capital buffers significantly reduce long-run risk-taking, regulatory pressure simultaneously induces undercapitalised banks to increase risk exposure, confirming a moral hazard channel. Both the non-oil business cycle and the oil revenue cycle generate compound procyclicality in Nigerian bank capital and risk-taking behaviour. The originality of this study lies in its introduction of the oil revenue cycle as an explicit explanatory variable and its application of the Panel ARDL-PMG framework — which disentangles long-run equilibrium effects from short-run dynamics to the Nigerian banking context for the first time. The findings carry direct implications for the CBN's 2024 recapitalization mandate and macro-prudential policy design in resource-dependent banking systems.

 

References

Abbas, F., Ali, S., Moudud-Ul-Huq, S., & Naveed, M. (2021). Nexus between bank capital and risk-taking behaviour: Empirical evidence from US commercial banks. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1947557. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1947557

Abbas, F., Masood, O., Ali, S., & Rizwan, S. (2021). How do capital ratios affect bank risk-taking: New evidence from the United States. SAGE Open, 11(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020979678

Abbas, F., Yousaf, I., Ali, S., & Wong, W.-K. (2021). Bank capital buffer and economic growth: New insights from the US banking sector. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(4), 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14040142

Albulescu, C. T. (2022). Bank financial stability and international oil prices: Evidence from listed Russian public banks. Eastern European Economics, 60(3), 217–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2022.2064876

Ashraf, B. N., Zheng, C., Jiang, C., & Qian, N. (2020). Capital regulation, deposit insurance and bank risk: International evidence from normal and crisis periods. Research in International Business and Finance, 52, 101188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101188

Banna, H., & Alam, M. R. (2021). Impact of digital financial inclusion on ASEAN banking stability: Implications for the post-COVID-19 era. Studies in Economics and Finance, 38(2), 504–523.

Bardi, W., & Hfaiedh, M. A. (2021). International trade and economic growth: Evidence from a panel ARDL-PMG approach. International Economics and Economic Policy, 18(4), 847–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-021-00507-4

Begenau, J. (2020). Capital requirements, risk choice, and liquidity provision in a business-cycle model. Journal of Financial Economics, 136(2), 355–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.10.004

Bostandzic, D., Irresberger, F., Juelsrud, R. E., & Weiß, G. N. F. (2022). Do capital requirements make banks safer? Evidence from a quasinatural experiment. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 57(5), 1805–1833. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109021000612

Boufateh, T., & Saadaoui, Z. (2020). Do asymmetric financial development shocks matter for CO2 emissions in Africa? A nonlinear panel ARDL-PMG approach. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 25, 809–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-020-09722-w

Brana, S., Campmas, A., & Lapteacru, I. (2019). (Un)Conventional monetary policy and bank risk-taking: A nonlinear relationship. Economic Modelling, 81, 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.07.005

Cappelletti, G., Reghezza, A., Rodríguez d’Acri, C., & Spaggiari, M. (2022). Compositional effects of bank capital buffers and interactions with monetary policy. Journal of Banking & Finance, 140, 106530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2022.106530

Danisman, G. O., & Demirel, P. (2019). Bank risk-taking in developed countries: The influence of market power and bank regulations. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 59, 202–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2018.12.007

Degryse, H., Karapetyan, A., & Karmakar, S. (2021). To ask or not to ask? Bank capital requirements and loan collateralization. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(1), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.017

Dias, R. (2021). Capital regulation and bank risk-taking: New global evidence. Accounting & Finance, 61(1), 847–884. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12595

Ding, X., Lou, W., & Wu, C. (2023). The influence of Basel III on Islamic bank risk. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 9(1), 167–198. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v9i1.1590

Elsayed, A. H., Naifar, N., Uddin, G. S., & Wang, G.-J. (2023). Multilayer information spillover networks between oil shocks and banking sectors: Evidence from oil-rich countries. International Review of Financial Analysis, 87, 102602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102602

Erülgen, A., Rjoub, H., & Adalıer, A. (2020). Bank characteristics effect on capital structure: Evidence from PMG and CS-ARDL. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(12), 310. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13120310

Fraisse, H., Lé, M., & Thesmar, D. (2020). The real effects of bank capital requirements. Management Science, 66(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3222

Garcia, M. T. M., & Ye, A. J. (2023). Risk-taking by banks: Evidence from European Union countries. China Finance Review International, 13(4), 537–567. https://doi.org/10.1108/CFRI-12-2022-0248

Haque, F. (2019). Ownership, regulation and bank risk-taking: Evidence from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-07-2017-0135

Hunjra, A. I., Hanif, M., Mehmood, R., & Nguyen, L. V. (2021). Diversification, corporate governance, regulation and bank risk-taking. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 19(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-03-2020-0071

Ibrahim, M. H. (2019). Oil and macro-financial linkages: Evidence from the GCC countries. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 72, 1–13.

Jiang, H., & Yuan, C. (2022). Monetary policy, capital regulation and bank risk-taking: Evidence from China. Journal of Asian Economics, 82, 101512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2022.101512

Killins, R. N., & Mollick, A. V. (2020). Performance of Canadian banks and oil price movements. Research in International Business and Finance, 54, 101258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101258

Lee, C.-C., & Lee, C.-C. (2019). Oil price shocks and Chinese banking performance: Do country risks matter? Energy Economics, 77, 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.01.010

Lundtofte, F., & Nielsen, C. Y. (2019). The effect of stricter capital regulation on banks’ risk-taking: Theory and evidence. European Financial Management, 25(5), 1229–1248. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12205

Maghyereh, A., & Abdoh, H. (2021). The effect of structural oil shocks on bank systemic risk in the GCC countries. Energy Economics, 103, 105568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105568

Maghyereh, A., Abdoh, H., & Al-Shboul, M. (2022). Oil structural shocks, bank-level characteristics, and systemic risk: Evidence from dual banking systems. Economic Systems, 46(4), 101038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2022.101038

Mateev, M., Moudud-Ul-Huq, S., Sahyouni, A., & Tariq, M. U. (2022). Capital regulation, competition and risk-taking: Policy implications for banking sector stability in the MENA region. Research in International Business and Finance, 60, 101579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101579

Mateev, M., Nasr, T., & Sahyouni, A. (2022). Capital regulation, market power and bank risk-taking in the MENA region: New evidence for Islamic and conventional banks. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 86, 134–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2022.07.005

Mateev, M., Sahyouni, A., & Tariq, M. U. (2023). Bank regulation, ownership and risk taking behavior in the MENA region: Policy implications for banks in emerging economies. Review of Managerial Science, 17(1), 287–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00529-5

Moudud-Ul-Huq, S. (2021). The impact of business cycle on banks’ capital buffer, risk and efficiency: A dynamic GMM approach from a developing economy. Global Business Review, 22(4), 921–940.

Nasim, A., & Downing, G. (2023). Energy shocks and bank performance in the advanced economies. Energy Economics, 118, 106517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106517

Pfeifer, L., & Hodula, M. (2021). A profit-to-provisioning approach to setting the countercyclical capital buffer. Economic Systems, 45(1), 100853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2021.100853

Reigl, N., & Uusküla, L. (2021). Alternative frameworks for measuring credit gaps and setting countercyclical capital buffers. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 13(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-04-2019-0070

Siddika, A., & Haron, R. (2020). Capital regulation and ownership structure on bank risk. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 28(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRC-02-2019-0015

Srivastava, B., Singh, S., & Jain, S. (2023). Bank competition, risk-taking and financial stability: Insights from an emerging economy. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 33(5), 959–992. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-10-2021-0143

Wahinya, P. W., Ondiba, R. O., & Kariuki, P. W. O. (2023). Competition, risk-taking behavior and stability of commercial banks: Evidence from Kenya. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 14(4), 600–614. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-03-2022-0123

Zribi, W., & Boufateh, T. (2020). Asymmetric CEO confidence and CSR: A nonlinear panel ARDL-PMG approach. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 22, e00176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2020.e00176

Downloads

Published

2024-11-30

How to Cite

Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Charles Chukwuma Soludo, Folarin Ikpesu, Tolulope Osinubi, & Kazeem O. Ajide. (2024). Capital Buffer Dynamics and Risk-Taking Behaviour of Nigerian Commercial Banks in the Post-Reform Era. Journal of Economics Business Industry, 2(2), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.59976/jebin.v2i2.250

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.